Copyright:  This review is copyrighted.  For more information, see the copyright page.

Review
of
Introductory Quantum Optics
by
Christopher C.  Gerry and Peter L. Knight

    I read this book to teach myself quantum optics. 
Since I read it as a self-study text,
I will review it from that perspective. 
Some of the weaknesses noted might be less important for a classroom text.
 
    The Gerry/Knight text is billed as suitable for
"senior undergraduates and beginning postgraduates", but
I fear that undergraduates who attempt it as a self-study text
are likely to end up frustrated.
I can't recall ever encountering
an undergraduate with a background in mathematics and quantum mechanics
sufficient to read this book in a reasonable time without the guidance of an instructor. 
If used for self-study, I think that minimal prerequisites would be
a graduate level understanding of abstract linear algebra and quantum mechanics.
Some familiarity with Fock space and
the theory of operators on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces
would be desirable.

    Because the book is intended for beginners,
the authors take pains to explain many things which a beginner might not know.
Most of the explanations were careful and helpful, but I was dissatisfied with some.
I read the book cover to cover and was able to follow most of it,
but some of it (e.g, much of the chapter on decoherence)
is still a mystery to me.

   Chapter 9 describes recent experiments in quantum optics which
demonstrate amazing properties of light unimaginable from a classical perspective.
The presentations of the physical setups give just the right amount of
detail for clear understanding.
The diagrams are good.
However, I felt that the mathematical analyses would be easier
for those with good backgrounds if done on a higher level,
and some of the physical discussions seemed obscure.

    Given the authors' intended audience,
it may be unreasonable to quarrel with their choice of mathematical level. 
However, it is truly unfortunate that some of
their calculational details seem actually wrong. 
For example, in Section 9.3's discussion of a ``quantum eraser'',
several terms appear to be omitted from equation (9.21),
which invalidates some of the subsequent discussion.
Moreover, the discussion is obscure and seems of questionable validity
even were the text's (9.21) correct.

    The file http://www.math.umb.edu/~sp/appendix.pdf gives more details.
You will need Acrobat Reader to view this file.
You may need the book in front of you to follow the argument fully,
but  even without it, you may be able to get a sense of some of the problems.

    I noticed  few actual errors such as the above, but
there are an unusually large number of typos.
Most are relatively insignificant, but nevertheless distracting.
Careful editing of a second edition would result in a more easily usable product.

    My copy is by now riddled with underlined statements with marginal notes
like "Why?", or "What does this mean?" 
As I progressed through the book and my understanding deepened,
many  of these "Why's" were erased, but quite a few remain.

   The reader who wants to learn quantum optics and has
the necessary mathematical background may wish that
parts of the book were more carefully written,
but he will not be fundamentally disappointed.
This is a good book.

    I bought the paperback version for $44 from amazon.com; 
in hardcover it costs $110.
(The price difference has almost no relation to the manufacturing cost,
which is at most a few dollars.)
My copy is falling apart after only a few weeks of careful use at home.
A book this good deserves a more durable binding.