Since retiring, I have had time to read some interesting books, and I plan to review some of them here.
Following are the first reviews.
Click here for the review in untypset format which should be readable on any computer.
Click here to download the typset version gerryknight.pdf. You will need the Adobe Acrobat program to read this file.

A similar review is posted on amazon.com. 
Since that review could not contain symbols,
the discussion of  some errors in the book referred to the file appendix.pdf  for the technical details.
The typset version "gerryknight.pdf" above already contains "appendix.pdf",
so if you have gerryknight.pdf, there is no need to download appendix.pdf.
Click here for the review in untypeset format which should be readable on any computer.
Click here to download the typset version scullyzubairy.pdf.  You will need the Adobe Acrobat program to read this file.

Click here for the review in untypeset format which should be readable on any computer.
Click here to download the typset version  bachorralph.pdf .  You will need the Adobe Acrobat program to read this file.

To download the review of Collective Electrodynamics in  .pdf   format, click on mead.pdf.
To download the review of  Quantum Paradoxes in .pdf format, click on  paradoxes.pdf.

There are two reviews, a short review similar to one I posted on amazon.com, and a much longer review which discusses in detail  some aspects of the book about which I have wondered.  The short review is a text file, and the long one is in .pdf format.  To download the short review, click on  shortquantcmp.txt .  For the long review, click on quantcmp.pdf .
Added March 6, 2010.   For the review in .txt format (only) of  "Decoherence", click here.

Note that this is not the latest edition.  
The review in .txt format was originally placed on Amazon.com around June, 2016.  This is a 5-star book (highest rating)!
I rated this book 3 out of a highest 5 on Amazon.com, in a review titled "A good read but a poor textbook".  
The review title pretty much says it all, and the reasons are given in the review itself in .txt format.


And, at some point I would like to review a very old book:
    This is a masterpiece which is not as well known as I think it deserves.
It is basically a typset but otherwise nearly verbatim rendering of  the author's written lecture notes for a 1960 Harvard course.
A friend sent me the original mimeographed notes around 1963, and I was enthralled.
I had already completed a year's graduate course in quantum mechanics, of which relatively little seemed to make sense.
I was astonished that Mackey's notes made sense!

    It may seem a little dated today, but not nearly as much as one would expect after more than forty years.
Even today, I  know of no better introduction to quantum mechanics
for mathematically mature readers (U.S. Masters level at least).
I am rereading it, and still learning from it.