Department of Mathematics
Mathematics Colloquium - Spring 2011
Thursday, April 21st, 2011
2:00pm - 3:00pm, in Science 2-066 Thomas ZaslavskyBinghamton UniversityNonattacking Chess Pieces: The Bishops' Dance
Abstract:
Recreational chess fans (of Western chess) have asked
questions like: What is the largest number of identical pieces
(queens, or bishops, or ...) that can be placed on a chessboard so
none attacks any other? Some have tried to solve a harder question:
Given q identical pieces, how many ways can they be placed on an n x n
chessboard? Here q is fixed, n is variable. For some chess pieces the
answer, surprisingly, is given by a cyclically repeating sequence of
polynomials in n. This can be proved by geometry. To find the
polynomials one must know how long the sequence is (the 'period').
That can be partly solved by geometry, but it is hard. The bishop
moves and attacks diagonally any distance. Seth Chaiken, Chris Hanusa,
and I have found that the bishop requires only 2 polynomials, no
matter how many bishops one has. The proof uses the geometric theory
of signed graphs. Vaclav Kotesovec has found amazingly many formulas
for non-attacking chess pieces, but no proofs. Our theorem implies (I
think) that his method of computation is strong enough to give correct
formulas for the bishops. His formulas show surprising properties,
some of which we think we'll be able to prove. I will explain the
geometry and graph theory that lies behind all the foregoing
assertions.
|
![]() |